Format Penulisan Jurnal Full From Another#

Format Penulisan Jurnal Full From Another

Author must ensure that the article sent to the editor is original, sourced from their own ideas and writings, and not traced in part or in full from another article. Originality and plagiarism. Format penulisan makalah bisa di unduh Template Jurnal Manajemen Aset. Selain itu setelah jumlah minimal terpenuhi 20, dapat pula ditambahkan sumber pustaka lainnya (misal buku teks).Penulisan Makalah pada JMAIF Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas. Jumlah artikel 20 buah adalah jumlah minimal, oleh karena itu artikel yang direview bisa lebih dari 20 buah.

If the article sent to LITERASI HUKUM has previously been sent to another journal but has not been published, the author must include a letter of revocation of the article from the previous journal.Semua artikel yang masuk akan melalui peer-review process setelah memenuhi persayaratan sesuai pedoman penulisan artikel. Repeat publishing. Author must guarantee that the articles sent to LITERASI HUKUM has never been published in a journal or other publication (chapters in books, articles in newspapers and so on). Pedoman Penulisan Artikel Jurnal, Surabaya: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Menulis Artikel untuk Jurnal Ilmiah. Langkah-langkah Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah dalam Saukah, Ali dan Waseso, M.G.

Information of publication and review process. Editor must ensure that writing guidelines for authors can be accessed easily, both print and electronic. The editor must guarantee that the authors have the right to be given information openly about the status of their articles, process and reasons for an article to be accepted, rejected or corrected. The editor's decision to accept, reject or return an article to be revised by the author is accompanied by clear reasons. Transparency. Article review process should be conducted transparently. Objectivity. Editor ensures that the editing process is conducted purely with scientific and academic considerations.

Transparency. Article review process should be conducted transparently. Review process is carried out objectively and professionally regardless of gender, religious background, race, ethnicity, citizenship, political partnership and so on. Reviews should be conducted objectively with academic and scientific considerations. Editors must guarantee the confidentiality of both the author and data in the articles. Editor must ensure that they do not notify the reviewer about the authors being reviewer.

Originality and plagiarism. If there is a citation error, reviewer notifies the editor. Reviewer must check whether the reference sources have been cited correctly. Peer review must ensure that the articles reviewed have met good writing standards. If an article is decided to be revised by the author, reviewer points out the part that must be revised so that it can be a guide for the writer to improve the article. If an article is decided to be rejected, reviewer gives a clear reason for being rejected.

If reviewer needs additional time or is likely to not be able to complete the review process on time, they must notify the LITERASI HUKUM editor. Reviewer must complete the article review process according to the agreed time, which is in 2 weeks. Such as the author is their colleague, involved as a research team member, the topic written is the institution where the reviewer works and so on. Conflict of interest. Reviewers tell the editor honestly if they happen to be reviewing an article that has a conflict of interest with them. Editor must confirm and further examine the plagiarism indication found by the reviewer. Reviewer can notify LITERASI HUKUM editor if there is an indication of the plagiarism of the article that was examined.